“Most coders have sleep problems, need ‘hygiene and care'”

Interesting. And true, too… I taught myself to get to sleep very easily in my early twenties (I might write more about that if people are curious), but while running my previous business, there were a couple run-ins with malicious hackers that screwed up my sleep patterns immensely… I could still get to sleep, but I could only stay asleep for about six hours, which is usually not enough for me. It has been nearly a decade since those happened, and I still have to take afternoon naps most days.

Time, Knowledge, and Experience

Historically, the only three non-physical things that people will pay for are time, knowledge, and experience. Everything else can be broken down into one or more of those. For example, your average person working at the local Burger Shack or Wendell’s Widgets factory is trading his time (in the form of unskilled labor) for money. He’s an easily-replaced cog in the wheel of commerce; he can’t charge much for his work, because there are almost always other people willing to do it for less.

(As an aside: that’s the primary reason for the way such jobs are designed. Such employers don’t want skilled labor that could then charge more, they want interchangeable warm bodies to do the simple — to a human — tasks that can’t cost-effectively be automated.)

(Another aside: unions were created to address this lack of individual power on the part of unskilled or low-skilled factory workers. They were a great idea to curb the worst abuses of employers in the Industrial Age, but the idea had gotten less and less relevant in the last forty or fifty years, until the recent Wisconsin teachers union was very publicly attacked by their governor. When unions get too much power, their primary purpose seems to be to blackmail employers into paying skilled-labor money to often patently unskilled people. But when they get too little, or are abolished or outlawed, you’re back to the worst excesses of the Industrial Age. There is a happy medium here, folks.)

Raw knowledge is also cheap these days. Since the explosion in popularity of the Internet in the mid-nineties, the cost of obtaining general knowledge on essentially any subject has dropped to near zero. It’s pretty much just the time that it takes a person to learn it now. I’ve picked up plenty of useful knowledge from the ‘net that would have been very expensive (in both time and money) to track down pre-Internet. Assuming it was even available then; a lot of stuff wasn’t worth the time and effort for someone to write a book about, or wasn’t of enough general interest, so it was just passed from mentor to student and was completely unavailable to anyone without access to such a mentor.

At one time, you could make a good living solely by raw knowledge. For example, merely by knowing where things were in a big city with lots of foreign visitors, you could set yourself up as a guide and earn a decent wage for life. But because it is so easy for anyone to obtain now, very few people can get by solely on their raw knowledge anymore.

But experience (and its more developed form, expertise) is a different beast entirely. It can only be obtained by spending time, effort, and other personal resources on a subject. It can’t be passed around like raw knowledge; once a person earns it, it can’t be bought, taxed away, stolen, or passed on to his heirs. And if it’s in a subject that there’s some demand for, that person can charge a great deal for exercising it. Lawyers and doctors are somewhat artificial examples of this, because they have to be licensed in order to practice in their fields, but there are a growing number of other fields where it also applies. Simply knowing the secrets of karate masters, software developers, or stage magicians, for example, won’t make you a karate master, software developer, or stage magician.

If you’re looking for a new field to get into, it would behoove you to tackle something that requires experience as well as knowledge — the more, the better. Otherwise the next casualty in the Information Revolution might be you.

“Praying for meltdown: The media and the nukes”

Two final articles, from different writers at The Register, on the Fukushima nuclear plant.

I can understand why TV newscasts would do such a thing (for those living under a rock, they’ve tried to present it as a disaster of epic proportions, though in reality it was just a minor footnote to the true disaster of the earthquake and tsunami), and though I haven’t seen many newspapers on the subject, I suspect they’re just as bad. The reason, summed up to one word: ratings.

News flash for you, newscasters: deliberately misrepresenting the news like that isn’t going to get you more viewers in the long run. There’s a reason that people are increasingly getting their news from sources like the Internet, and this will just serve to drive them away faster.

Maybe short-term ratings boosts are all they can hope for these days? If so, I’d definitely be shorting stock in TV newscasters.

Spambot Purge

I got tired of the nearly one thousand spambot “users” on this blog and mass-deleted any account that had never posted a non-spam comment and had no optional user information. I also added a confirmation-link requirement, and auto-removal of any account that doesn’t complete the confirmation within seven days. Apologies to any human users who might have had their accounts deleted… but I rather doubt any did, since I don’t require an account to post comments.

One Hundred Fifty Thousand Spam Attempts in 90 Days

After three months of near-silence, I’m back. Project M is nearly ready for beta (six months of work so far, and it’s still not quite usable… sheesh!), so I think I can spare the time to blog again. I may not write daily for a bit, but I’ll try.

The first thing I’d like to write about is the comment-spam problem. As long-time readers know, I’ve got a multi-layered setup that deals with that very well — so well that I have zero problem with false positives, and almost no spam gets through even the first layer. But I’ve been seeing an oddly large number of messages caught by the second layer in the last few months, so I took a look at the statistics.

There have been a jaw-droppingly large number of spam attempts recently. In the last six months of 2010, there were something like 42,000. In the first three months of 2011, I’ve already had 154,373!

(Smug note: the “oddly large number of messages caught by the second layer” mentioned above, which are the only ones that I even need to glance at out of that huge number, has amounted to something like twenty messages. 😉 )

Apparently no one else is seeing this kind of massive spam increase, so I did a little digging. It appears that almost all of these attacks are pounding on a single post. It has been the most popular post on this blog since it was first published at the end of June, and its popularity has been steadily growing in the months since. It’s now nearly a hundred times more popular than it was even then. And considering its content, I’m certain that its popularity was entirely with spam-bots.

(I have no idea why an army of spam-bots selected that post to attack. It’s got a number of legitimate comments, but that’s the only odd thing I’ve noticed about it.)

I’ve closed the comments on that post, which should put a halt to the flood. We’ll see how that goes.

“Fukushima: Situation improving all the time”

I have to break my self-imposed silence again.

I don’t pay much attention to newspapers or television news. By definition, the only things they’ll air are bad news (“if it bleeds, it leads”), which gives an extremely warped and unnecessarily depressing view of the world. What little I’ve seen of their reporting on the situation at the six damaged nuclear power plants in Fukushima, Japan, after the recent earthquake and tsunami, just proves the point.

From everything I’ve seen, those power plants dealt with the problems staggeringly well:

The reactors involved are a 40-year-old design and much less safe than modern ones. They were hit by an earthquake five times as strong as they were built to take, followed by a tsunami wave now assessed as having being more than 12 metres high – twice the height their defences were specified to withstand. It now appears that despite all this they have not and will not harm a hair on anyone’s head radiologically. Even everyday physical-trauma casualties have been very low compared to those seen elsewhere in the disaster zone. […] Operating nuclear power stations is not just very safe, or safer than other methods of generating power. It has to be one of the safest forms of activity undertaken by the human race.

That said, nuclear power isn’t really going to be hurt by the scaremongering and ignorance. Japan is going to continue using it because they have little choice, and most other places aren’t likely to, at least in the near future, for unrelated economic reasons.