“Naps Can Seriously Improve All-Day Learning Abilities”
I never needed to be convinced of this, but it’s nice to know nonetheless.
I never needed to be convinced of this, but it’s nice to know nonetheless.
Very intriguing. Unfortunately it sounds too good to be true, so it probably isn’t.
I’ve spent the last few days integrating my new math library into the Windows project I started coding it for. Yesterday morning I was ready to try running the integrated copy, but I had some kind of problem starting it up. I couldn’t track it down very easily though, due to how long it took …
Oops. I guess someone should have paid more attention in school. 😉
Well, duh! That’s what shields were invented for! 😉
When I first read this, I couldn’t believe it. But then I thought about it a little more, and realized that it fits a general scenario: whenever you give people a sufficiently large reason (severe penalties for failure, or large bonuses for success), they’re going to try to game the system. Always. Yes, even (some) …
Continue reading ‘“Detecting Cheating by Analyzing Erased Answers”’ »
In one of the science fiction series that I used to read, the hero kept in constant contact with his robot companion through a surgically implanted microphone and earphone. This isn’t quite in that league, but it sounds like a solid piece of work. I have to wonder if it would work on denture-wearers, though. …
Good tips on a subject that few of us know how to handle at all, let alone how to handle well.
All I can say to this is, “um, yeah.” Something else I’d never have thought of myself… and likely with good reason. 🙂
“Seriously, though, wouldn’t you have killed for this when you were 14?” I certainly would have. Sometimes I regret the inevitability of growing up (or at least older 😉 ). (Via LifeHacker’s “Remains of the Day” feature)