Spam purveyors are apparently having a very tough time getting past Bayesian filters. Check out this one:
Subject: If you had a gold fish, you would ask for a bigger instrument.
Would you like to have as many women so you could forget their names? All that would be possible if you added some extra inches to your beef stick. Just ask us how and we will help.
Site for everybody
(The “site for everybody” text was a link to a Yahoo Groups group with a randomly generated name, which had already been pulled by the time I saw the message this morning, a few hours after receiving it.)
“Gold fish”? After much thought, I vaguely recalled a childhood tale of a fisherman catching a golden fish that traded some wishes for its freedom, but it was quite a stretch to link it to that subject line. And while “bigger instrument” is an oft-used term in such messages, unless you’re a musician or you work at a science lab, it’s unlikely to be a common and innocuous phrase in your e-mail messages. “Beef stick” is amusing though, I haven’t seen it in such messages before.
Nice try guys, but it was rated as 98%-probable spam here. “Keep practicing!” 🙂