“CNN: No restrictions on presidential debate footage”

I stand in awe and amazement at the announcement that CNN will release all of their Presidential debate coverage “without restrictions at the conclusion of each live debate.” As far as I can tell, that means that anyone is allowed to post pieces of it on the ‘net, cut and remix it, publicly broadcast it… all of the things that TV and movie companies always refuse.

There has to be a catch somewhere, but so far, I haven’t seen it. I hesitate to believe that any public company would, or even could, do anything that might possibly prevent them from squeezing every last squealing penny from anything they might be able to claim belongs to them, just because it’s the right thing to do. It goes against everything that Big Business has stood for for the past quarter of a century.

Then again… the Republican Party is in major hot water with the public on all sorts of topics, from the Iraq war to Bush’s totalitarian tactics at home. At this point, they’d probably come off as a poor second in a debate with an Eliza program. Maybe someone left-leaning at CNN thinks that this will help sink them. Or maybe CNN just sees a major bloodbath coming, figuratively speaking, and thinks that this will gain them more in free publicity and public good-will than they’re likely to ever see from the debate clips in revenues… if so, they’re almost certainly correct, since I have no doubt that their logo will be prominently displayed on all of their footage.

Whew! My hard-won cynicism, having repelled the vicious surprise attack, is secure once again. 😉

2 Comments

  1. CNN didn’t decide to do it until after Obama and Edwards told them to release it under Creative Commons. If they hadn’t, they would have faced a lot of negative publicity in the blogosphere for going against the wishes of the candidates themselves, and the piracy of CNN would have a political element that would have made the rest of the media jump on it. I suspect if Obama hadn’t insisted on it, CNN would have done what MSNBC did (the host of the pre-CC-license request debates), put it under DRM, if not also charged for the content.

Comments are closed.