Apparently it’s disgust, at least as far as expressions go. Interesting and very plausible note on Darwin at the end.
5 Comments
This seems a bit naive, it assumes that emotional opposites must be merely a function of which muscles are expanded and contracted on the face, with a one to one correspondence.
It sounds like you read the article, but missed the point. It only talks about expressions; it doesn’t say that the emotions are opposites.
Well, your article was entitled…. “What is the opposite of fear” 🙂
Because the one that I linked to is titled that — thus the quotation marks. But it’s all about expressions.
It’d be more comprehensible if it were about regular expressions. 😉
This seems a bit naive, it assumes that emotional opposites must be merely a function of which muscles are expanded and contracted on the face, with a one to one correspondence.
It sounds like you read the article, but missed the point. It only talks about expressions; it doesn’t say that the emotions are opposites.
Well, your article was entitled…. “What is the opposite of fear” 🙂
Because the one that I linked to is titled that — thus the quotation marks. But it’s all about expressions.
It’d be more comprehensible if it were about regular expressions. 😉