<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Safari for Windows&#8230; but why?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/2008/04/21/safari-for-windows-but-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/2008/04/21/safari-for-windows-but-why/</link>
	<description>Miscellaneous ramblings on miscellaneous topics</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Head Geek</title>
		<link>http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/2008/04/21/safari-for-windows-but-why/comment-page-1/#comment-1362</link>
		<dc:creator>Head Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/?p=482#comment-1362</guid>
		<description>Yes, we wouldn't want Apple's Lawyer Legions to descend upon us because we forgot the (tm) there. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, we wouldn&#8217;t want Apple&#8217;s Lawyer Legions to descend upon us because we forgot the &#8482; there. <img src='http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: safari for windows</title>
		<link>http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/2008/04/21/safari-for-windows-but-why/comment-page-1/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator>safari for windows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/?p=482#comment-1361</guid>
		<description>[...] Safari for Windows but why? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Safari for Windows but why? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ploni Almoni</title>
		<link>http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/2008/04/21/safari-for-windows-but-why/comment-page-1/#comment-1360</link>
		<dc:creator>Ploni Almoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/?p=482#comment-1360</guid>
		<description>I meant Website Distortion Field(tm).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant Website Distortion Field(tm).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ploni Almoni</title>
		<link>http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/2008/04/21/safari-for-windows-but-why/comment-page-1/#comment-1359</link>
		<dc:creator>Ploni Almoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/?p=482#comment-1359</guid>
		<description>Tweaking? Who needs tweaking? Safari comes with its own website distortion field, which will automatically tweak the website remotely. Some people though claim this is yet another Safari exploit. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tweaking? Who needs tweaking? Safari comes with its own website distortion field, which will automatically tweak the website remotely. Some people though claim this is yet another Safari exploit. <img src='http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Head Geek</title>
		<link>http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/2008/04/21/safari-for-windows-but-why/comment-page-1/#comment-1357</link>
		<dc:creator>Head Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/?p=482#comment-1357</guid>
		<description>That relies on Safari getting enough of a following that web developers consider it worth tweaking for. I'm not sure that's going to happen. But I'm not complaining, because a diverse software ecosystem is almost always harder for malware to exploit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That relies on Safari getting enough of a following that web developers consider it worth tweaking for. I&#8217;m not sure that&#8217;s going to happen. But I&#8217;m not complaining, because a diverse software ecosystem is almost always harder for malware to exploit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ploni Almoni</title>
		<link>http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/2008/04/21/safari-for-windows-but-why/comment-page-1/#comment-1350</link>
		<dc:creator>Ploni Almoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/?p=482#comment-1350</guid>
		<description>It's so websites are written to work better with the iPhone, which runs under an embedded version of Darwin (Mac OS X's underpinnings) and uses a version of Safari. At least, that's the explanation I've read from tech journalists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s so websites are written to work better with the iPhone, which runs under an embedded version of Darwin (Mac OS X&#8217;s underpinnings) and uses a version of Safari. At least, that&#8217;s the explanation I&#8217;ve read from tech journalists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
