<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I love ZFS!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/2007/12/16/i-love-zfs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/2007/12/16/i-love-zfs/</link>
	<description>Miscellaneous ramblings on miscellaneous topics</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Lee</title>
		<link>http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/2007/12/16/i-love-zfs/#comment-700</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/2007/12/16/i-love-zfs/#comment-700</guid>
		<description>True, DTrace may be more difficult to implement solely in userspace, unfortunately. Unless Linux becomes a microkernel. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, DTrace may be more difficult to implement solely in userspace, unfortunately. Unless Linux becomes a microkernel. <img src='http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Head Geek</title>
		<link>http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/2007/12/16/i-love-zfs/#comment-696</link>
		<dc:creator>Head Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 05:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/2007/12/16/i-love-zfs/#comment-696</guid>
		<description>From what I hear, that's why Sun licensed ZFS the way they did -- it can't legally be integrated into the Linux kernel, as I understand it. Not that that matters a great deal, the FUSE implementation is pretty good, even in it's current unoptimized state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I hear, that&#8217;s why Sun licensed ZFS the way they did &#8212; it can&#8217;t legally be integrated into the Linux kernel, as I understand it. Not that that matters a great deal, the FUSE implementation is pretty good, even in it&#8217;s current unoptimized state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Lee</title>
		<link>http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/2007/12/16/i-love-zfs/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/2007/12/16/i-love-zfs/#comment-692</guid>
		<description>All we need is DTrace and Linux will woop Solaris simply for being also more user-friendly. (I don't mean the GUI, that's identical now, I mean the legacy System V interface compared to GNU.) Of course, Solaris is also a rock-solid system otherwise, and there's a few other good things (Like the better compiler than gcc, though I believe Sun makes their C compiler for Linux too - and on Intel Intel's compiler is yet better than Sun's. To be fair, gcc is probably the most portable compiler around...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All we need is DTrace and Linux will woop Solaris simply for being also more user-friendly. (I don&#8217;t mean the GUI, that&#8217;s identical now, I mean the legacy System V interface compared to GNU.) Of course, Solaris is also a rock-solid system otherwise, and there&#8217;s a few other good things (Like the better compiler than gcc, though I believe Sun makes their C compiler for Linux too - and on Intel Intel&#8217;s compiler is yet better than Sun&#8217;s. To be fair, gcc is probably the most portable compiler around&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
