<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Latest Accidentally Amusing Spam Roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/2007/08/29/the-latest-accidentally-amusing-spam-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/2007/08/29/the-latest-accidentally-amusing-spam-roundup/</link>
	<description>Miscellaneous ramblings on miscellaneous topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:18:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Head Geek</title>
		<link>http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/2007/08/29/the-latest-accidentally-amusing-spam-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>Head Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/2007/08/29/the-latest-accidentally-amusing-spam-roundup/#comment-453</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m afraid you&#039;re right. I thought that they&#039;d finally gotten someone who spoke the language to update their text, because I hadn&#039;t seen that one before, but I&#039;ve gotten so many more of the synonym ones since then that it&#039;s pretty obvious that that one was a fluke, or (as you suggested) the original.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I guess I&#039;ll have to retract the most-improved-English award. :-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid you&#8217;re right. I thought that they&#8217;d finally gotten someone who spoke the language to update their text, because I hadn&#8217;t seen that one before, but I&#8217;ve gotten so many more of the synonym ones since then that it&#8217;s pretty obvious that that one was a fluke, or (as you suggested) the original.</p>

<p>I guess I&#8217;ll have to retract the most-improved-English award. <img src='http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/2007/08/29/the-latest-accidentally-amusing-spam-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekblog.oakcircle.com/2007/08/29/the-latest-accidentally-amusing-spam-roundup/#comment-450</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve been following the Megadik spam line for a little while now.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think what it happening here is that a simple sentence (probably the last one you list) is being reconstructed randomly with a range of what the writer considers to be synonyms for various key words. I have several more examples myself, and all follow the same construction. The chances that the writer stumbled on the English-like version is slim. I think they probably started there.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The same thing goes for the various subjects headers. They are all riffs on &quot;My boyfriend&#039;s dick is too large for my small mouth&quot; or &quot;When I give my man head, I practically choke&quot; or &quot;My boyfriend&#039;s dick keeps slipping out&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve started to look forward to receiving these to find out what new abuse of online dictionaries is going to arrive next.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Gotta admit, though: whizgiggled has me stumped.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been following the Megadik spam line for a little while now.</p>

<p>I think what it happening here is that a simple sentence (probably the last one you list) is being reconstructed randomly with a range of what the writer considers to be synonyms for various key words. I have several more examples myself, and all follow the same construction. The chances that the writer stumbled on the English-like version is slim. I think they probably started there.</p>

<p>The same thing goes for the various subjects headers. They are all riffs on &#8220;My boyfriend&#8217;s dick is too large for my small mouth&#8221; or &#8220;When I give my man head, I practically choke&#8221; or &#8220;My boyfriend&#8217;s dick keeps slipping out&#8221;</p>

<p>I&#8217;ve started to look forward to receiving these to find out what new abuse of online dictionaries is going to arrive next.</p>

<p>Gotta admit, though: whizgiggled has me stumped.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

